R-Squared Energy Blog

Pure Energy

Web 2.0

Slowly but surely I am getting sucked into the networking aspect of the ‘Web 2.0’ world. For a long time I ignored these sites, but have come to appreciate that they can be used to share links and ideas and to keep up with people/sites I am interested in.

I guess it started out with an invitation to join LinkedIn (My Profile here). LinkedIn is a social networking site for professionals, and I imagine it would be quite handy if one were searching for a job. As of this writing, I have 42 connections on LinkedIn, many people I work with now or have in the past.

Next came Facebook, which is more of a purely social networking site than LinkedIn. (My Facebook profile here). I typically provide some updates there, but I have to be careful that I don’t get sucked into endless chats. I usually pop in and out quickly to avoid that. I have 65 ‘friends’ on Facebook currently, including people I have never met, people who read R-Squared, classmates from high school and college, and even family members. I find Facebook to be OK for keeping up with friends, but it can turn into a real time-waster as there are numerous pointless games and such designed to keep people on the site for as long as possible.

Finally, I signed up with Twitter last week. (My Twitter profile here). Still not sure how that experiment is going to pan out. The nice thing about Facebook and Twitter is that I can provide short updates from my Blackberry. That is pretty handy when I am on the road. I plan to utilize both next week when I am in D.C. if I think there is anything of interest to report.

There are numerous other sites along the lines of the ones I have mentioned, but I think these will keep me busy enough for now. (If you think I missed an important one, please mention it).

To summarize, LinkedIn has proven occasionally useful and is good for keeping up with professional colleagues, but I think it would be especially useful for job seekers. Facebook is a good place to hook up with friends from 20 years ago, but it can also be used to share links and chat about particular areas of interest. Twitter is more of an experiment for me at this stage, but I plan to give it a workout next week.

Speaking of next week, it will largely be quiet for me as I attend the 2009 EIA Energy Conference. I just noticed today that Secretary of Energy Steven Chu is giving the keynote address. There are lots of other interesting topics to be discussed, so I will take good notes and provide an update after the conference.

Advertisements

April 3, 2009 - Posted by | EIA, Steven Chu, Web 2.0

11 Comments

  1. I would be interested in your thoughts on Chu. I liked him at first, like Jimmy Carter.

    He may be brilliant and I may agree with his values but I do not think I would like him covering my back in a knife fight. We need an Admiral Rickover behind energy policy. Someone who can sit a Senate hearing and not get pushed around.

    Comment by Kit P | April 3, 2009

  2. I would be interested in your thoughts on Chu. I liked him at first, like Jimmy Carter.

    He may be brilliant and I may agree with his values but I do not think I would like him covering my back in a knife fight. We need an Admiral Rickover behind energy policy. Someone who can sit a Senate hearing and not get pushed around.

    Comment by Kit P | April 3, 2009

  3. I would be interested in your thoughts on Chu. I liked him at first, like Jimmy Carter. He may be brilliant and I may agree with his values but I do not think I would like him covering my back in a knife fight. We need an Admiral Rickover behind energy policy. Someone who can sit a Senate hearing and not get pushed around.

    Comment by Kit P | April 3, 2009

  4. Kit, I wrote some thoughts just after the team was announced:

    Thoughts on the New Energy Team

    In general, I think Chu is obviously brilliant and knowledgeable across a range of different energy technologies. He seems quite idealistic, though, and this is where I have a possible concern.

    As Dave Cohen argued last week in The Secretary of Synthetic Biology Chu is seemingly unconcerned that we might have any sort of short-term energy supply issues. Everything is geared toward the long-term. He may be correct, but if he isn’t we could be seeing some supply shortages within 10 years.

    RR

    Comment by Robert Rapier | April 3, 2009

  5. Kit, I wrote some thoughts just after the team was announced:Thoughts on the New Energy TeamIn general, I think Chu is obviously brilliant and knowledgeable across a range of different energy technologies. He seems quite idealistic, though, and this is where I have a possible concern. As Dave Cohen argued last week in The Secretary of Synthetic Biology Chu is seemingly unconcerned that we might have any sort of short-term energy supply issues. Everything is geared toward the long-term. He may be correct, but if he isn’t we could be seeing some supply shortages within 10 years.RR

    Comment by Robert Rapier | April 3, 2009

  6. “Finally, I signed up with Twitter last week. (My Twitter profile here). Still not sure how that experiment is going to pan out.”

    How will you be able to say something in < 140 characters?

    Comment by Wendell Mercantile | April 3, 2009

  7. “Finally, I signed up with Twitter last week. (My Twitter profile here). Still not sure how that experiment is going to pan out.”

    How will you be able to say something in < 140 characters?

    Comment by Wendell Mercantile | April 3, 2009

  8. “Finally, I signed up with Twitter last week. (My Twitter profile here). Still not sure how that experiment is going to pan out.”How will you be able to say something in < 140 characters?

    Comment by Wendell Mercantile | April 3, 2009

  9. How will you be able to say something in < 140 characters?

    Therein lies the challenge, and the main reason I consider this an experiment.

    RR

    Comment by Robert Rapier | April 3, 2009

  10. How will you be able to say something in < 140 characters?

    Therein lies the challenge, and the main reason I consider this an experiment.

    RR

    Comment by Robert Rapier | April 3, 2009

  11. How will you be able to say something in < 140 characters?Therein lies the challenge, and the main reason I consider this an experiment.RR

    Comment by Robert Rapier | April 3, 2009


Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.

%d bloggers like this: